Do Pedestal Fans Use Much Electricity?

the fourth king

qs years I have not heard a bat. you? http://www.glidemagazine.com/
articles/54183/the- glide -20 -

our-top-albums-of-2008.html

Where Is Annabel Chong Today?

glide top20

With linux there and cron shutdown before shutting down the computer when you want. But under Windows XP? There is a shutdown.exe command

. is located in C: \\ Windows \\ System32 \\

. C: \\ WINDOWS \\ system32> shutdown.exe Usage: shutdown.exe [-i -s Shutdown the computer -r Shutdown and restart the computer
-a Abort a system shutdown -m \\computername Remote computer to shutdown/restart/abort -t xx Set timeout for shutdown to xx seconds -c "comment" Shutdown comment (maximum of 127 characters) -f Forces running applications to close without warning
-d [u][p]:xx:yy The reason code for the shutdown

u is the user code
p is a planned shutdown code
xx is the major reason code (positive integer less Than 256)
yy is the minor reason code (positive integer less Than 65536)

So turn off your computer after it has finished doing what he should do, just open a command line and give:




C: \\ WINDOWS \\ system32> TimeInSeconds shutdown.exe-s-t-c "now turn off everything!" -F

PS: The-d option is particularly cryptic to me ...

Things That Will Dsiqualify You From Navy

For several months, are given an appointment outside the town hall of Cagliari in Via Roma, cold wind, water does not stop them, they are there for ask for the stabilization of the work, are there to ask the right costituzionele work, women are and men over 45, too old to find a job. " They have the criteria of the national budget stabilization, but the City of Cagliari has no desire to stabilize the second because the institution does not have the financial criteria established by national law. A tug of war between Directors and precarious, that goes on now for March (9 months), and several variegatamente varied were the promises made to workers by labor and management, yet it is looking for a solution and working women and men 25 nov.2008 precarious tomorrow will be there to give their discounts.

LL I

precarious .. we are a cultural association, this is our official website

Jolteon Stuff Animals

Precarious Precarious Cagliari Cagliari

after months of long struggle, at the gates of the City of Cagliari ask for stabilization, according to legal requirements and financial workers in precarious employment of Cagliari, participating in the strike 14 days of the Civil Service Cgil November 2008 to ask the "right to work because it is a right to life"

Luca Locci

I

precarious .. we are a cultural association, this is our official website

Pain Just Above Belly Button When Pregnant

stabilizing action


ITALIAN REPUBLIC ON BEHALF OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE
N. 2230/2008
Reg.Dec.
N. Reg.Ric 1278.

YEAR 2008 The Council of State in the courts (Section Sixth) gives the following
ORDER
the appeal brought by VERDUSCHI ANNA MARIA, represented by defense lawyer Peter Valentino and ADAMI LARD with an address in Rome during the Italy, 97, at the office of the first, against

UNIVERSITY MINISTRY 'AND RESEARCH, represented and defended by the State with an address in Rome by the Portuguese, 12;
and against
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, represented and defended by the state with home in Rome by the Portuguese, 12;
Genu CHRISTIAN Cananzi PAUL, ROBERTA Sorace, Mastrodicasa LAURA, LAURA THE FOOL, Scipione Giuliani and IDA not OUR ESTABLISHED;

for annulment of the Judgement of the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio Rome office Sec. No III 5779/2007.
Since the action with its annexes;
Since the entry of appearance in court of the State Advocacy;
Views memories from Parties in support of their defenses;
Given all the acts of the case;
At the public hearing '11 March 2008 the Director Roberto Vigotti rapporteur;
hearing represented. Lard;
held and considered in fact and in law the following: FACT

Mrs. Anna Maria Verduschi exhibits have been taken, which led to winning the Order of selection December 14, 2001 and as administrative assistant, under the Ministry of Education, University and Scientific Research with fixed-term contract lasting two years with effect from December 21, 2001, contract was subsequently extended until December 21 2004.
Subsequently, Verduschi has won a contest for a post-term operator for the profile of Administration at the Inter-University Consortium of Lombardy for automatic processing (Chile), consisting of universities in Lombardy, and was assigned to the MIUR (where he worked to date) pursuant to an agreement between the ministry and the consortium, with effect from Ist June 2005.
By Decree of 7 September 2007 was opened with the procedure stabilization, in art. 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 269, December 27, 2006, staff employed under fixed-term employment contract. A process was attended by the applicant, but the Decree of 25 September 2007, with which it was approved list do not include it among the permanent staff.
against the decree of convocation of the process and against the decree approving the list, to that extent, appealed to the TAR of Lazio Verduschi seeking the annulment after suspension, but the contested order, the request for interim is was rejected on the assumption of the effectiveness of Article estoppel. 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 296 of 2006, and there are no significant doubts as to whether constitutional provision invoked. With the notice of appeal
now under consideration, the applicant proposes the following complaints it made at first instance, criticizing the contested order, that is not motivated on:
Violation art. 519 paragraph 1 Law No. 296, 2006, in the alternative constitutional illegality of that provision for violation of Articles. 3:57 of the Constitution, because the provision, for present purposes, provides for the application of stabilization non-managerial staff who has been in service for at least three years, although not continuous, during the five years preceding the entry into force of the law, provided it is taken by insolvency or provided by law.
The appellant, whose employment began on December 21, 2001 (before then of the first in December 2002, the date on which it started five years prior to December 31, 2006, when the law came into force in speech) did not able to take advantage of stabilization, since, as interpreted by the administration, the period of reference must be included in all the five years.
This interpretation, according to the appellant, the purple of the provision itself, which aims to stabilize precarious labor relations for years, and should therefore be applied more favorably as going back in time is a temporary situation that you want to heal. The interpretation endorsed by
arises, however, in contrast with the parameters indicated in the epigraph constitutional, since the applicant's professional relationship, which lasted for three years continuously, can not be stabilized because did not take place entirely within five years, while the rules allow the stabilization of relations split over time (and therefore less indicative of expertise reached), provided that all took place in five years. There is thus violated the principle of equality, because of favorable treatment reserved for situations more indicative of professionalism, and the canon of good administration, because of the public to make use of employees with greater professionalism.
Violation art. 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 296, 2006. Violation of the principles of seniority. Ultra vires in several respects.
The employment of the applicant was held from 21 December 2001-21 December 2004: only for ten days did not, therefore, reached Dec. 31, 2004, deadline that would have placed the employment period in the range useful to stabilizing . Moreover, it must refer to principles in terms of conventional current law on retirement indemnities (where the art. 2120 of the Civil Code provides for the rounding of fractions per month equal to or greater than fifteen days) and that determined The deadline for the applicant to the calculation of the liquidation.
Violation of Article. 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 296, 2006. Violation of the principles of seniority. Excess power from different angles. The rule still allows
stabilization of fixed-term staff in at least three years even if not continuous, or that achieves this requirement in under contracts concluded before the date of September 29, 2006. Not even on the list made for staff to fulfill this requirement include the applicant, who also was awarded with effect from Ist June 2005 to MIUR under a current agreement with the consortium Cilea, from which she was hired under contract in time and that, therefore, should be considered still in service at the ministry said, noting nothing in the absence of a specific contract with the PA. Its location, in fact, is comparable to the institution of control, which are applicable to the benefits granted to permanent staff, in addition, the Verduschi was also suitable in a procedure of selection for the conclusion of fixed-term contracts with the ministry, which ended before 29 September 2006.
Violation art. 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 296, 2006. In the alternative, unconstitutional pursuant to violation of Articles. 3 and 97 of the Constitution.
The appellant began his employment with the Ministry of Education as the winner of a selection that ended with the decree of December 14, 2001, and was passed on December 21, 2001. Among those who have benefited from the stabilization there are also people who were in the list referred to in the decree that is not as likely winners, having been hired after the applicant, within the parameters time needed for stabilization . It 'so obvious that the rule should be interpreted as an epigraph to the same objective conditions which allowed the short term employment involving the same treatment in order to stabilize the relationship , otherwise, would be in violation of the constitutional requirements because it occur an unjustified unequal treatment of persons placed in the same ranking, with the benefit of those located in less favorable position.
The applicant claims for the reform of the contested, resulting in a conditional admission in the rankings considered, in the alternative, because the question constitutionality described above be referred to the Constitutional Court .
It consists of the administration, seeking confirmation of the order under appeal.
Following today's closed session, the Chamber has, by separate order, granted the request for an injunction filed by the applicant, until the outcome of the incidental question of constitutionality to which this decision.
LAW
since it believes the Board that Article. 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 296 of 2006 is suspected of possible violation of Articles. 3 and 97 of the Constitution in ways that will be described below. In addition to
not manifestly unfounded, the question is important in order to decide, since the objections raised by the appellant in the main are unfounded.
I) For logical reasons, should be examined for the claim made by the third reason for the appeal, in which the applicant, taken at the time established in the consortium Cilea and assigned to the Ministry under an existing agreement between these two authorities, sets out the traceability of its case under the standard as those already on staff in service.
The claim has no basis, since, as noted by the same subject (which, in application to the end of stabilization, relied on the certificate provided for those who, at the time, was not in service), the service provided by the Ministry of Education has not conducted under a specific contract with the government, provided by the standard prerequisite to the application of the benefit for party dealing with it.
II) This necessitates further examining the complaints made by the applicant in order to allow investigation of different profiles, if any, stabilization of its report in light of interpretations of the relevant legislation different from that implemented by the Ministry . The
stabilization of workers on temporary contracts provided by subparagraph of Article 519. 1 of Law No 296 of 2006 provides an exception to the normal system in the civil service, which is the title dell'incardinazione in the administrative organization to determine the type and regulation of the relationship.
As the exceptional rule, is also remembered that strictly interpreted, and can not, therefore, to extend its effectiveness in addition to the cases established by the legislature, it follows that can not be traced to the interpretation that the applicant proposes to save from suspicious infringement of constitutional the article in question, extending its reach beyond the cases covered by point. Thus, contrary to supported in the first reason, the explicit location of the valid period for the stabilization within the five years preceding the entry into force of Law No 296 of 2006, ie from 1 January 2002, applies to exclude that may be considered in cases (such as that of the applicant, which began Dec. 21, 2001) where the duration of this period is not fully understood in ' that time frame.
Similarly, with regard to what form the content of the second ground of appeal, the absence of ten days needed to complete the three years over the five years commencing on January 1, 2002 (the applicant's employment relationship with il ministero si è, infatti, concluso il 21 dicembre 2004) vale ad escludere la riconducibilità del caso nell’ambito della fattispecie normativa, senza che, in contrario, possano valere principi o calcoli considerati ai fini di diversi istituti, in particolare ai fini del trattamento di fine rapporto.
III) Essendo in conclusione preclusa qualunque interpretazione che valga ad estendere l’applicazione del beneficio oltre i casi previsti dalla lettera della disposizione, ed in particolare al caso della ricorrente, occorre allora indagare se la norma stessa sia, senza alcun dubbio, rispettosa dei canoni costituzionali.
Come si è premesso, il Collegio ritiene che la risposta non possa essere positiva, per ragioni highlighted in a way emblematic of the case.
The applicant, winner of the insolvency proceedings ended with a decree of the competent office of the Director of the Ministry of Education on December 14, 2001, entered service December 21, 2001, and could not enjoy the stabilization for the reason that the three-year work did not end, as explained above, in the five years commencing on 1 January 2002. As stated in the TAR of Lazio in the contested order, the stabilization is in fact precluded by Article. 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 296, 2006.
The selection of the winning position, resulting in recruitment with effect immediate applicant has ultimately led to the disadvantage compared to others who, when placed in the same ranking as likely not winners, they should wait for the recruitment, and following the occurrence of new conditions (such as additional vacation places), and, therefore, would begin their working relationship dates subsequent to December 21, 2001, however, potentially would satisfy the requirement imposed by the temporal law, as stated above, by reference to the five-year period commencing on January 1, 2002 .
Since the list approved by the decree under which the applicant was employed there as a subject collocatosi eligible non-winning, the question does not remain in theory but is relevant to the decision, without having to bring the investigation requested by the call to verify the practical effect of the adequate intake. Even the inevitable postponement of the initial period, compared with the starting date of employment of the applicant appears, in fact, exposed to risk, such as those of their non-winners of the insolvency proceedings, have been in the system devised by the law, and equal other conditions, better treatment than those with which they can enjoy the winners of that competition, discrimination based on the given time of the beginning of the relationship work, which is rather indicative of a better evaluation of the comparative merits. A similar effect of applying
dutifully literal rule can not but cast doubt on the responsiveness of the same Articles. 3 and 97 of the Constitution: the first that expression of the reasonableness of fees, prohibiting situations in which deserve more favorable treatment is applied on the second, which requires that public offices are governed by rules that guarantee the efficiency and good performance and, therefore, that the choice of employees to proceed from the most deserving. The question to the parameter
constitutional is also in jeopardy from having taken requirement at a given time of the accidental, released from a reference (as, for example, the inclusion in the same classification and its time to exhaustion) valid due to the same treatment in similar situations to the detriment of those most deserving, with specifying that it is true that the legislature is free to determine the conditions of application of the rule, however, the choice must be consistent with the rationale that it intends to pursue, that ratio in this case is identified in the opportunity to bring stability to relationships precarious employment, the benefit of workers and the administration to which they are applied. Compared to that end, the requirement of mere temporal element beginning of the report, which, as stated above, in the same bankruptcy is not related to variables indicative of greater meritevolezza by workers and / or a greater advantage by the administration appears to be inconsistent and therefore not reasonable.
The question is not manifestly ill-founded and relevant to the decision (it is clear that, as mentioned above, the applicant would see a refusal to stabilization of its working relationship with the ministry if the date of commencement of work precarious was calculated with reference to all the locations involved in the same ranking) should therefore be called examination Constitutional Court, while the trial in progress must be suspended until the decision of the Court. PQM

The Council of State, Section VI, considered to be significant and not manifestly unfounded, the question of the constitutionality of Article . 1 paragraph 519 of the Law 296, 2006, to the extent specified reasons, contrary to Article 3 and Article 97 of the Constitution
- stays proceedings in progress;
-order transmission of this ordinance and the acts of the proceedings to the Constitutional Court ;
- sort the service of that order to the parties and the Presidency of the Council of Ministers and its communication the presidents of both houses of parliament.
Decided in Rome, 11 March 2008 by the State Council, the courts - Sez.VI - in the Council Chamber, with the intervention of the Lords:
President Joseph Barbagallo
Carmine Volpe Director
Luciano Barra Caracciolo Director
Bruno Polito Director Rosario
Vigotti Councillor Robert East

President Joseph Barbagallo
Board Secretary Roberta
Vigotti Vittorio Zoffoli
FILED IN OFFICE
il...13/05/2008
(Art. 55, L.27/4/1982 , No. 186) The Director of the Chamber

Maria Rita Oliva
STATE COUNCIL
the courts (Sixth Chamber)
Addi ................................... certified copy of this was forwarded to
Ministry ................................................. .............................................
in accordance with art. 87 of the Rules of Procedure August 17, 1907 n.642
The Director of the Secretariat
NRG 1278/2008
FF I

precarious .. we are a cultural association, this is our official website

Should U Work With Chest Infection

on the head of the precarious law

we were absent for a period taken from too busy, we dinuovo with you. I

precarious .. we are a cultural association, this is our official website

Fashiontv Midnight Hot

automatic shutdown in windows xp blank screen with IBM T20


I am a happy owner of an IBM Thinkpad T20. provided by the employer in 2000 and redeemed during an exchange machines. Pentium 3, 384M RAM, 750MHz, a USB1.0, CDRW, SD card reader, pcmcia. After 8 years, which has been treated very badly, it works like a dream. Only the CD a few problems: The contacts that dancing is not always recognized. Having a car
anzianotta available to me to try a certain operating system
. Surely to learn, but also to be in order. Why obtain software illegally when there is an alternative as much, if not more valid? But if the alternative is equally concerned about the compatibility of obsolete machines, when the market leader offers a new version
that assumes to renew the hardware, I would say that it is reasonable that comes into play also the ecological and economic component. Why waste and waste that is when I have more than enough? So, in short, the T20 runs xubuntu

. Until only a few firefox tabs and when you want to see a video you have the foresight to close as many applications, the responsiveness of the PC is more than acceptable. One thing is very interesting to see the reactions that makes using the other half. Of course, browsing, web mail, and a little 'office. Some mumble the vision of openoffice ("Why do not excel there?", "But this word is not it?"), But all in all a reaction quite soft and no "give me back windows." Of course, now that is return to the use of PCs, I can not do too many tests on distributions ("but because sometimes change everything? you can not leave just one way?"). I'd be curious to try the version of incoming

opensuse

, the first distro tested and abandoned when, I do not know in what condition, appeared a funny behavior that I could not solve. The bug was as follows. Randomly not start the X server. That is, every 2 to 3 boot the screen goes black and there was no way to unlock the PC if not press the reset button ignition by a fine. So after a few days of shaking the head passed to the "soldering". First with the same version of opensuse (the 11.0), then, since the bug remained, with ubuntu 8.04. That solved the problem. That have recurred after the 'upgrade to 8.10.

At this point, the problem was not the distribution, but of something else. Google here, Google there, it turns out this

. So, question the interaction between the Savage video card and Xorg. The surface gauge (workaround) to fix everything is to add in the Device section Xorg.con file (located in / etc / xorg.conf) the two lines: Option "BusType" "PCI" Option "DmaMode" "None"
Et voila. All returned operating like new. Through the network, thanks to the community, thanks to Linux, a good old PC still works.

What To Do If Your Friend Has A Spaz

I found myself with a set of files generated by a Linux machine whose name was entered in the ':' character. bringing them under windows the file name was truncated and the file unreadable. how to rename them all at once?

rename 's / \\ * :/-/'

via

1 and 2

.

How Do Say Sweetheart In Greek

bulk rename files

Goodbye, cruel blog, I'm leaving you today. Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye. Goodbye all you people, There's nothing you can say,
To make me change my mind. Goodbye.

Watch Play-mate Of The Apes (2002) Online

How To Service Fiat 411r Tractor

split stone Palladian